Some compelling reasons not to use Facebook…
In a Nutshell: 10 Reasons To Be Anti-Facebook (In No Particular Order)
1. Facebook does not enhance friendship.
Facebook is a catalogue of faces, nothing more. Yes, it cannot be denied that Facebook might help one stay vaguely in touch with a far-away friend. But Facebook is utterly hollow at its core. Virtual poking is nothing when compared to a real touch; a phone call is so much better than a click. Facebook may make one feel content and ”up to date” after a few clicks and comments, but that is mere deception.
2. Facebook promotes the loss of civility.
Facebook fosters an autonomous, nihilistic attitude toward one’s surroundings and, in fact, reality itself. Facebook encourages one to become tethered by the overload of information streaming around and to him on the site. It becomes harder and harder to focus and live in the real, non-virtual world. As more and more time is spent interacting with others in such a distant and remote way, the traditional forms of communication cannot but be lost. When the virtual world becomes a primary tool of pleasure, civilization must feel the blow.
3. Facebook is a time-sucker.
What Dr. Jeff Mirus says about Twitter I would also say in regards to Facebook: “In most cases it is just another way to waste time by living not in the real moment but in an unending series of virtual moments.” One blogger listed the following as an encouraging reason to acquire Facebook: “It is fun to waste/fill/kill time interacting w/friends by playing the odd ‘identify the famous actor as a child quiz.’” I must say it, and risk being dubbed a curmudgeon at the ripe old age of just seventeen: There are few dumber ways to waste time than by taking these inane quizes that seem so plentiful on Facebook. Anyhow, apart from that, Facebook consumes time that will never be regained, and some of us still hope that people have better ways to spend this ephemeral life.
4. Facebook, among other things, is killing literacy in our nation.
This exempt from an article on “postmodern moonshine” is enlightening because it adopts itself well to the matter at hand: “We deny the depth and intensity of the crisis… at our peril, for the attacks against proven standards in composition teaching and literacy studies are part of a larger campaign of demolition that is being waged by the left… The situation certainly is perverse, but there is nothing “bizarre” about the mechanics of intellectual subversion, and nothing has been hidden from our eyes about the goals of the academic left, which has openly declared its antipathy to the great works of Western literature, standards of good writing in composition instruction, and what Danny J. Anderson contemptuously refers to as “the illusion of masterable knowledge and meaning…” – Steve Kogan
My point is not directly about postmodernism and certainly not directly about the academic left. The point is that literacy has sunk to a crisis in our nation, and if our language continues to disintegrate… I am afraid we will not linger long. Facebook grotesquely takes advantage of this crisis; its very format lends itself to deconstruction.
Simone Weil states that the true aim of education is to inculcate habits of disciplined attention. Contrast this with the endless and chiefly pointless series of virtual moments which the mind encounters via Facebook.
5. Facebook indicates a lack of spiritual maturity.
6. Facebook indicates a mental adolescence.
“This absorption in ourselves, in celebrities, in personalities, and in useless distraction resembles nothing so much as adolescence.” -Dr. Jeff Mirus.
Unfortunately, Facebook is not an adolescent phenomenon. It is used by every age group, and is not even dominated by youngsters. Look at the statistics for the U.S. August 2009. While 65+ account for 2.9% of the Facebook population, 13 and under account for a mere .8%. There are just about as many 25-34 year olds in the Facebook community (24.9%) as 18-24 year olds (25.1%). A full 40% of Facebookers are 35+!
7. Facebook is Soap Opera LIVE.
Another unhappy aspect of interacting in the Facebook community is that one too easily learns more than he needs to know. It should not be gratifying to learn of the dirt of other people. Yet Facebook turns human lives into soap operas.
8. Facebook is an indication of the influence of peer pressure in our society, and a symbol of the loneliness of the modern world and breakdown of the family.
9. Facebook is an extensive, international networking system.
How do you feel about really concentrated power? By the by, safety guarantees can never be definitive on the web. Think of May 2009, when Facebook users suffered a massive phishing campaign launched by Russian hackers from servers in Latvia and China. This attack led to thousands of Facebook accounts being hijacked. But, more importantly, it is important to realize the colossal extent which Facebook has spread. It is a huge, international technological phenomenon… and that very thought makes some of us rather uncomfortable.
10. Facebook is a sham.
There is a mammoth discrepancy between endless chatter and having nothing to say. “Certainly, each major shift in communications media has a profound impact on culture… but shaping culture in various ways is not quite the same as having a message, and ultimately our endless fixation on the delights and distractions of modern media does a great deal to ensure that nobody has a real message to communicate.” – Dr. Jeff Mirus
This is just the beginning; more on this later!





43 comments
Comments feed for this article
November 13, 2009 at 7:21 pm
Marissa S. F.
Facebook is indeed pure flapdoodle! You put down simply skookum reasons to be wary!
March 31, 2010 at 1:36 pm
Kylie
About “Inane quizzes that seem so plentiful on Facebook”, I have heard of one that tells which character from the “Twilight” series you are most like. Why do you want to know that?
May 17, 2010 at 12:15 am
Shen
Facebook is the devil’s favorite book. END.
May 17, 2010 at 1:03 pm
Jones
Facebook does encourage poor grammar, false connections with other people, and opens every person on there to insults from their fellow peers…take the webiste ‘failbook’ on which ‘friends’ post their other ‘friends’ embarrassing mistakes. I do not think Facebook is /evil/ per se, but it is definitely a waste of time and a cause of serious deteriation to our society and literacy. (Many people have been fired from jobs from being addicted to Facebook and doing it at work, or because of harsh/rude/mean/profane/etc things that they posted on their facebook page.
As for the keeping in touch with others, Facebook provides a fast, heartless way to yes–stay in touch with–these other people, but there is no substance there, no way to write a long, thought out email or letter, no effort to make a call…simply a ‘what’s up?’ ‘ha ha lol’ sham of a relationship with these people, making the conversations in real society slowly shallower as people lose the ability to really say what they mean and make them afraid to share deeper thoughts because such ideas can result in negative responses on Facebook.
May 22, 2010 at 10:35 pm
Lorelle
We’re working on a podcast show about anti-Facebook sentiments and the Quit Facebook campaign to record Monday (May 24) and we’d love to have you join us. Please contact me to participate. Thanks!
May 23, 2010 at 7:16 pm
calvarypatriot
Lorelle,
If it isn’t too late, could you please send me more information about this?
Thank you!
Savanna Buckner
August 9, 2010 at 9:11 pm
Tod, Why No Facebook? « tod|brock
[...] to be wary of Facebook, things that I did not base my decision on, but are good to review as well: http://theantifacebookleague.com/about/ - a good [...]
August 31, 2010 at 12:06 pm
Lisa DellaVecchia
Facebook creates a kinky interplay between the exhibitionist and the voyeur. At times one may take on one role, and at other times the other, but at all times there is a sense of peering and showing, of seeing what you shouldn’t see or wish you hadn’t seen, of knowing you are being baited and then not knowing how to respond because hundreds of eyes are watching you. You are forever naked and running for cover, or you are flashing your “wares” for all eyes to see, looking around for the response you seek to get….the accolades, the high fives, the angry reactions, whatever you seek to accomplish. Even if you are just using it to advocate for some deep and important cause—spiritual, political, educational, what have you—you are still putting yourself on exibit. You think you are above the fray and only showing the “real you,” but even the real you isn’t really real. It is still a cry for attention, a probe for a response, or a way to show others what you stand for. Even while pulling away from the trappings of Facebook you are still compelled to justify your decision to stay on there, and the only way to do that is to post articles on topics of importance, thus showing others how much more enlightened you are than they are. Simply put, no matter how hard you try, there is no way out of the kinkiness of Facebook. And by you, I mean me, too.
September 12, 2011 at 6:00 pm
Soul Sojourner
If, by some chance, you still check this or have it set to notify you when someone replies, I would love to get a hold of you and talk more about your take on Facebook. I wrote a post not long ago, about how I considered Facebook to be “porn for personalities” and I would absolutely love to hear your insight.
November 7, 2010 at 12:34 pm
Godfrey
Hmm, I’m anti-facebook (never had one) but this place is clearly very right-leaning and jesus-y, which I’m not OK with. Before everyone starts getting all red-faced and condemning me to hell, could someone please point me toward a secular, apolitical option. Pretty sure this comment will get censored but I figured it was worth a try
December 10, 2010 at 9:53 pm
Amanda
nice it wasnt censored! i dont know if there is any reason to be at either extreme… if we are to view facebook for what it is, a tool rather than something so meaningful, i.e, yes its popular but still some people dont give two cents about it, then really theres no need to despise it or love it, then its how people use it that really cause the problems. im not doubting my belief that some are true about facebook (hence the reason why i stumbled upon this page in the first place
) but we cant go blaming facebook now its not like its a board game where there are set rules, pieces, turns to take, there is a human aspect to it and i think thats what really causes the problems, but its that very human aspect that makes it quite complicated especially as it grows and booms in popularity and becomes part of so many people’s lives…
December 10, 2010 at 9:56 pm
Amanda
… which i think is worth considering…
December 10, 2010 at 9:43 pm
Amanda
the fact that #8 is the only reason without the need of any further explanation speaks great volumes… im in!
January 29, 2011 at 6:44 pm
Amnesiac
I find some of the reasons mentioned here quite weak. Let’s take the first one: Facebook does not enhance friendship. Facebook (and other social media) redefined the word ‘friend’ and thus ‘friendship’, which means any made connection between two individuals on Facebook is an enhancement of friendship. Besides, sharing more private information could be clearly seen as a deliberate act of anchoring friendship and getting to know your ‘friend’ better, one of the key elements of friendship. That this shared info can be seen by several others makes the content less valuable, therefore the friendship, true. But it enhances the friendship compared to a situation where this information is not shared at all (and less when sharing it offline to one individual personally, yes).
I’m missing out some great other reasons not to use Facebook. For example:
1. Users of Facebook can only express themselves in pre-defined Facebook shapes. The different types of relationship-statuses for example are narrowed down to some choices, probably none of them truly expresses the real situation (what does ‘It’s complicated’ mean???). You can add content to your profile, but nothing that Facebook won’t allow you to do. Every individual is being shaped into one Facebook-creature that lacks a healthy amount of creativity. All creativity that does exist under users of Facebook is within the bandwidth of Facebook. Of course this limitation is similar to the limitation of e-mail, or posting a comment on this website (the comment-box will only allows me to add characters), but together with the ongoing domination of Facebook on the web (buttons, huge number of frequent users, etc.) it sucks dry other potential web-creativity, and it alters the way our brain comprehends thinking out-of-boxes.
(http://www.suite101.com/content/difficult-facebook-relationship-status-changes-a144569)
2. Facebook might be born as an idealistic project to connect students of Harvard, it has become a multi-billion dollar company, linked with other multi-bilion companies like Microsoft (advertisement and social searching) and its shares, when brought to the market, are the most wanted ones in the world. Why? Facebook’s making good money. And it will proceed doing so, as the world seems to get hooked up on Facebook. As the junkie can not live without his dealer, the Facebooker can not live without his network. Everybody is keeping each other in the commercial prison named Facebook. This would not be such a big problem, if Facebook would not know hardly everything of your life. Your privacy-setting won’t matter to them, they can (and will) keep track of you. Not just on their site, but throughout the web with Facebook apps and trackback-buttons. Facebook can link you with your social surrounding, with your job, your love, your (political) ideas, your habits. I will not say that it’s inevitable, but there is a true risk that Facebook (and its shareholders) will try to suck you dry whether you agree on it, are encouraged to it or are blackmailed to it. The more Facebook becomes a part in our lives, the more we want to give ourselves in on it to maintain the life we got used to. (exhibit a: http://www.dailytech.com/Facebook+Partners+Exposed+Violating+Sites+Privacy+Rules/article19907.htm)
3. Although users of Facebook might have a different opinion on this, Facebook makes people more anti-social. The first step of Facebook is connecting to everyone you know or once knew (how nice to see that your old neighbouring friend is changing jobs, even if we haven’t talked for over 15 years and since he moved far away the chances of seeing him ever again in my life are less than 0,001%; how much is this info worth to me?). We send some messages, inform people on our daily life, adding recent pictures of myself from time to time and be the first one to show my friends an interesting YouTube-movie, soon to be discovered by the rest of the world. So far so good, this ‘social life’ online. But as everyone is sharing more or less the same kind of information about their lives (what I’m thinking of now; what I did last weekend; what the next holiday-location will be; what concerts I will attend) the call to be seen and heard will be bigger and bigger. You can not stand the fact that you are putting an effort in updating your information, sharing privacy, and nobody is reading it or reacting on it. As a Facebook-person (or maybe modern e-human) you are playing the leading part in your personal movie, but no one is watching. How can that be possible, if everything in this world is created around ME? So, in order to get your 2 minutes of attention every day, you’re going to make your (virtual) life a bit more extreme, maybe even more provocative. And you will react impulsively on what everyone is typing. This will start a vicious circle which can’t be stopped. Once you create a more extreme identity, there’s no way back. You will care less about all those pathetic boring fools that still say their weekend was quiet and calm, you don’t care that they read an entire book in two days. The only thing you care about is what kind of extreme things your extreme friends were doing. Everything normal will be discriminated by the extremes promoted by users of Facebook. It will be a world of arrogant people continuously standing in the spotlights and big boring losers who are not worth talking to (including the biggest losers of all: the non-Facebookers). Since talking with interesting (extreme) people is much more interesting than talking to real-life losers, there will be less direct offline communication, and more online communication to virtual identities. A typical act of anti-social behaviour (just look at all the smart-phones in public areas).
I just found this website and since I’m obviously not a Facebook-user, I will bookmark it the old fashioned way
Keep up the good work…
January 31, 2011 at 8:24 pm
Indie in a Red State
Not much here to add, but I agree with you on #3 especially what you said at the end Amnesiac. Frankly I am too boring for FB, but thats alright. Your real friends will or should not care. I would much rather have face to face contact with real friend(s). Too bad they are now a few hundred miles away.I do have an account and have yet to delete it. I have lost interest for the most part. I much prefer the phone or email. At least my personal life is more likely to stay private. I should not have to keep jumping through hoops to make sure what I post or what group I join remains just that. Private.
March 13, 2011 at 4:07 pm
Régis Blain
Hello from Paris (France).
I totally agree with those 10 reasons. I like it at the beginning but I discovered it created emptiness. I believe in the number 1. People get connected, send emails and chat but don’t have a real talk, a cup of coffee or a beer. All is virtual which means vacuity.
I also ditched my cellphone which is worse than Facebook by the way !
I would propose to create a anticellphone league too
Thanks for the concept.
Régis
March 14, 2011 at 7:58 am
Kelly
I have no great love for Facebook, but I have an account. I have friends and family who have accounts as well. In most respects, it is a complete waste of time. However, I think Facebook is largely alive for it’s entertainment value. Much like other entertainments, it is meant to pass the time and make a little money for the creator, if possible.
There is no great probative value to the movie I saw recently. It was amusing, entertaining, and momentarily suspenseful. When I was younger I watched my Aunts watch Soap Operas while they did the laundry. Now, my little sister watches them between classes.
A dear friend of mine spent a great deal of time on Facebook during her Pregnancy. Afterwards, it was her primary form of communication. This might appear to work against me, but previously, the only way to speak with her was to visit her. That was not always possible. She had a phone. She did not wish to use it. She enjoyed speaking with us, but didn’t like phone conversations. For that reason, I joined her there and in truth, our relationship did strengthen. Conversations that might be spread across months took place over days. It was lovely to have my friend so close despite our distance.
Then, there is my mother-in-law. She’s a wonderful woman but she’s deaf. She also lives so far away we only see her during holidays. It is too much strain for any of us to travel that often. She adores Facebook because she feels closer to her family, immediate and extended. She loves the pictures and games because it’s an interactive entertainment she can play with us that doesn’t require her to hear. She browses her pictures and those of her family while we chat through the website. She tells me about their relationship to my husband and links me to their pages me while I help build her family tree. It doesn’t discourage our visits. In fact, it makes me more eager to show her all the things we’ve accomplished thus far.
I have more examples, and many more explanations but I’ve already gone on for quite a bit. I don’t doubt that there is a decline in the world, but if anything Facebook is a symptom, not the origin. If, it is that at all.
August 11, 2011 at 5:01 am
cc
Facebook as a primary form of communication? Is that really possible…I would hope that after bearing a child my friends would be more receptive to visit.
Facebook……Friends (3)
Virtual Friends (325)
March 25, 2011 at 5:26 pm
Russell Thompson
I’m on facebook, only because I am serious about being a success as a concert pianist, and going back to college, so I am using it only for connection with other musicians and organisations. But I have been tempted to quit it, and it has got so bad, that I have made my mind up to eventually quit it when I have come far enough. It’s mad. Poking people, adding freinds, sending someone a cake (couldn’t be bothered to get off your arse and go to the shop and buy one?), insane quizzes. I think there also should be a campaign against it. A BIG campaign. Here’s a bigger reason for this:
Someone typed the following message on the ‘wall’, which I just happened to notice, even though he wasn’t my ‘friend’: I’ve just had a wank’. This is not the sort of thing I want to experience on a daily basis, and after this, I was determined to leave facebook. I’ll bide my time.
March 31, 2011 at 11:36 am
Vukomanov
I could not agree more. These are the same reasons why I consider Facebook as a threat to our mind.
May 17, 2011 at 6:10 pm
So long Facebook! | Pete Haase
[...] Yeah, I had to do it – pull the plug on FB. I’ve seen the social networking stuff get out of hand to the point where people live online… look at Second Life (which I’ve never used, only seen btw). But, yeah, it’s pathetic. Because much of the work I do is online, spending more time sitting around on FB feels as though my hands have been glued to the keyboard. Twitter is much better for me; posts are short and sweet. Oh, and no more “applications”! So if anyone misses me on FB, come follow the bouncing ball on the T. *update – Anti-Facebook site shares my sentiments. I recently said sayonara and have found life much more well-balanced. theantifacebookleague.com/about [...]
November 3, 2011 at 9:24 am
Pete Haase
This is me, Pete Haase, replying to myself, which is probably due to my PTSD from years of FB conditioning. The irony of this post is a prime example of why not to use FB. LOL. (Oh, and that’s just short for laugh out loud). :>\
Anyway, what I really want to say is that I’m no longer using Twitter either. Who wants to be valuated based on how many followers one has? Also, unless one fires off trendy/appeal to the masses tweets, s/he shall remain follower-less and reader-less. Who would want to post something no one reads? In other words, if you are not famous and you truly care about meaningful things, there are better ways to express oneself.
The other bit of irony I’d like to comment on is that the above blurb that I’m replying to was auto-posted from my mention of this site. And, eventhough the source site no longer exists, here it is! What I’m saying is, people bash FB for saving information in a database for all to see… Well, what is happening here? I cannot delete a post from my own blog!
May 18, 2011 at 1:21 pm
jen
I’m told “everyone is on facebook , mom.”I searched for support in my belief of nay facebook. We are not everyone and I prefer to live in real time in reality & have tangble experiences! I would love to know spread the Anti-words here with the schools. I just may find a stealth manner to get by these supposed “role model adults” we send our kids to seek their education, without being deemed the unsavvy, overprotective parent. Life is not a popularity contest and FB friends are not your friends. How many of them do you call? know their birthday (without looking) give a hoot about what they are eating , doing, watching etc… Anti-facebookers UNITE for the survival of real people. Pull the plug on FB and you will have an epidemic new mental illness from the users in withdrawel! Be well real people!
May 26, 2011 at 4:12 pm
Wesley
Great post, and still relevant, if not more so than before!
I’ll be sure to look through your site some more
July 20, 2011 at 4:00 am
Don M
First let me say that in no way what so ever am I a religious person or an advocate of “family values” .With that said I do agree with you that face book is horrible on many levels.The most important reason I belive (that you did not indicate) is that face book is one giant invasion of privacy violation! You know George Orwell wrote of a future where all our civil liberties and rights to privacy were taken from us by force.Little did he know that in reality we would just so thoughtlessly hand them over for nothing more than the sake of mindless entertainment.
July 23, 2011 at 3:55 am
Vukomanov
Facebook is nothing but a bad way to promote yourself and level-down your entire personality. Many of them think that they will not be seduced by its advantages so they make their account. Step by step, they are getting Facebook-addicted. But, as long as there are some resistance like this, there is still hope to save the Internet, and, what is even more important, all those people who waste their time by sitting the whole day in front of their computer.
Do not give up the fight and keep up with good work.
July 27, 2011 at 1:37 am
Nick Cosmann
You’re forgetting to put that Facebook keeps everything you put on it in a database. It’s a very dangerous website, because with all the people on it and the massive amounts of information that goes through it, Facebook can literally be used as a global intelligence network. It’s too much power for any human being to have, and if it keeps growing, Facebook will become the only non-verbal way of communicating. Think of how easily we could all be monitored by the government. Facebook could turn itself and the government into an omnipresent entity and take away our most basic freedoms.
August 11, 2011 at 4:46 am
cc
Why is it that people find the need to post their daily lives for the world to see? Or take mobile photos of themselves? *Poke each other? (I’ve heard this too many times at work) Have *friends that really are not their friends? I will agree with Maynard on this one…I’m praying for tidal waves…put it back the way it ought to be. This world and society just sucks anymore.
Everyone put down their smartphones and just live.
August 21, 2011 at 3:20 pm
Moko-chan
Facebook, in the end, is just a big social disappointment. It is a commercial playground and a social parasite. True, you can keep up with old friends on some level of mildly authentic communication, but it can’t beat a real conversation. It also is a breeding ground for anti-life development (life that can’t be lived without social networking but encourages regression of social development). While we’re at it, it isn’t even social networking. It’s hardly “social” at all. It’s like an advertisement: it sure looks good, but you’re definitely hiding something. I am a high school kid without a facebook (it doesn’t deserve a capital letter!), and I am doing well in school, up-to-date with the world around me, and making friends I can be personal with.
While I’m at it, I here the word “Facebook” at school more than words such as “study”.
August 21, 2011 at 3:20 pm
Moko-chan
Wait, I meant “hear”.
September 10, 2011 at 9:54 am
Aeriel Cunanan
I’m probably one of the few teens who is passionately against the hideous facebook epidemic. It’s not surprising to me that adolescents have been consumed by it, but adults?
-sigh-
I am so thankful that I have two intelligent and independent-minded parents who are just as frustrated with our society as I am.
This is it people. We are the “chosen ones.” The select few that have been graced with abilities to perceive idiotic networking sites that take over the world.
October 11, 2011 at 11:07 pm
pranay
A Papier mache facade of friendship…masking reality…all that i see is stereotypical wannabes….!
October 24, 2011 at 6:15 am
Alan Jones
Any thing in moderation is good… Even drugs but when Facebook became a drug of addiction to my family, I said no more. Everyone who benefits from living in my home is bared from facebook. It’s been quite peaceful since my oldest and most outspoken son packed up and left home.
Last week it was can you lend me $100 for rent. This week it’s “OK, I’ll come home but only if I can have my own notebook”.
Call me a monster, call me anything you like but if killing facebook was the only way to get a 20 year old off his butt and out in the real world. I’d do it all over in a heartbeat. At his age I was in Vietnam carrying an M16 and 100 pounds of ammo through the jungle ready to shoot anything that moved.
If he thinks I did that and faced the furore of ‘free thinking radicals’ when I came home wounds that never heal just to witness my kids become obsessed with facebook… He and his mother have another thing coming.
December 1, 2011 at 10:27 am
Christine
http://www.azcentral.com/ent/celeb/articles/2011/11/28/20111128scarlett-johansson-facebook-twitter-very-strange.html
February 15, 2012 at 10:45 am
William
I have avoided time-wasting, self-worshiping Facebook since its inception. It annoys me that many retailers are now offering coupons and special savings to consumers “who Like Us on Facebook.” If you are not on Facebook, you cannot access these deals. I still will not join the sheep.
March 2, 2012 at 5:26 pm
Steve White
It makes me furious, the social pressures to be a part of Facebook. I run my own business and other people in business don’t understand why I won’t connect my business to Facebook.
I can not remove the Facebook ap from my mobile phone and if I force stop, it puts itself back on again.
Facebook is brainwashing everybody. It MUST be Stopped. PLEASE !.
Steve
March 3, 2012 at 1:57 am
Getting Facebook out of my face Memewars
[...] 10 Reasons to be Anti-Facebook [...]
March 3, 2012 at 4:03 pm
Alan Jones
Facebook??? Even the name is an oxymoron. What does it do? Bolster the ego of those who least need encouragement to inflate their own opinion of themselves. Is there a single person in this world who can explain in plain English, what value Facebook is to humanity? I don’t think so.
Oh… Like me on Facebook and I’ll be your friend for life!!! Absolutely unbeleivable waste of time and effort that’s making one bloke wealthy beyone comprehension. Can I create a business page? Yep but don’t try to use your trademark to describe it until you’ve got so many likers someone else has snatched the name and you wind up in a legal quagmire only the BMW and white shoe brigade can afford the cost of… Ground breaking legal Issues! Wow. That’s one to impress his mates and send shivvers down the spine of mere mortals.
If Facebook died today it would be missed no longer than it takes for the ripple of a stone dropped in a bucket of water to disapate before no one would care.
AJ
March 13, 2012 at 8:41 am
calaj
Priceless moment….
An annoying highschool classmate was desparately trying to fit in with a new group by forcing herself upon a group of girls with exagerative techniques like running up and hugging one girl whom she barely knew, pulling the ponytail of another and hanging on them. One girl asked her to please stop and don’t pull on my ponytail and the annoying classmate said “whats your name?” The girl replied, im not telling you. The annoying classmate said ” well I’ll just facebook you”, MY daughter replied “I”M NOT ON FACEBOOK, you won’t find me there!” The annoyed classmate was speechless… love it!
May 18, 2012 at 1:21 am
Geoffrey K Ellis.
Facebook is locker room garbage and how can it have value it has no substance it just rips off the advertisers. Stealing by stealth. Not a wise investment and will go bust in 10 years.
May 22, 2012 at 11:15 pm
Alienjones
I agree with most, if not all the comments here related to Facebook. Sooner or later someone is going to sue the company behind the name for a seriously large amount of money… Hopefully a group of people will do it. Why?
Take just one example. It’s “against Facebook rules” for anyone under 13 to open an account. OK so at least 28 under 13 year old’s I know of have suffered serious cyber bullying, a few resulting in physical bullying leading to Utube clips of the attacks.
It’s one thing to have a ruling that you must be 13 or over to open an account and quite another to not bother policing it. Facebook is also a haunt of pedophiles trying to pick up vulnerable children.
Try as I might, I can’t yet figure out the value of a ‘Like”. Is it some sort of status symbol? Maybe a measure of success? and what value is it to business? I ask this because all the Indian SEO experts who can’t leave my phone number alone keep telling me my business is suffering by not being in social networks. I’m sure my accountant will enjoy hearing this.
July 31, 2012 at 8:57 am
N. Brunner
I knew it! I already posted this message in the list of AFLI members along with a suggestion for making a COMMENT section link so that communication can be follwed easily and not scattered throughout the site. Anyway…now that i have spotted a fellow thinker I will post the comment here as well…. I can’t be the only one with this thought, but i am really serious here folks: What about organizing a mass class action suit against Zuckerberg for violating people’s right to privacy. I have no doubt there would be lots of witnessses to the damage his ‘creation’ has done to their lives. Fighting ‘Big Brother’ would be daunting, but…Savanna what are your thoughts? (Anybody willing to take this on “pro bono!” )
July 31, 2012 at 10:31 pm
Alienjones
Give it time and the law suits over the falling value of Facebook shares will make any class action by privacy seeking individuals – Hey! what are such people doing on facebook anyway? – pale into insignificance. Its already public knowledge that Zuckerberg stole the idea from his dorm mates. Now he’s made himself absurdly wealthy by selling shares in a public float.
This confirms my long held belief that honest people don’t get rich but honest people envy the crooks who do. Go figure that out!